Unraveling the Presence of American Bases in Iraq: Beyond the Veil of War

In the aftermath of Iraq’s destruction, a lingering question persists: Why do American military bases continue to occupy this war-torn nation? Many returning soldiers grapple with the ambiguity surrounding their mission, questioning the true motives behind a conflict that left them bewildered and, in some cases, haunted by the haunting specter of war.

While the initial rationale for the invasion pointed fingers at Iraq’s alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction, an admission by the United States later revealed that no such threat existed. This revelation led to a profound sense of disillusionment among those who had served on the front lines, prompting a reevaluation of the true objectives behind the military intervention.

Beyond the smoke and mirrors of weapons of mass destruction, a more nuanced and insidious motive emerges: the strategic control of oil resources and global trade routes. The Middle East, sitting atop vast reservoirs of oil, has become a geopolitical chessboard where nations vie for influence and dominance. The American military presence in Iraq, it seems, is a calculated move to secure a foothold in this energy-rich region.

Furthermore, the establishment of military bases in Iraq serves as a means of asserting control over critical trade routes. The geopolitical significance of the Middle East extends beyond its oil wealth; it is a nexus of trade connecting continents. By stationing troops strategically, the United States aims to wield influence over these vital arteries of commerce, safeguarding its economic interests on a global scale.

As testimonies from returning soldiers attest, the human cost of this geopolitical maneuvering is steep. The lives lost, the communities shattered, and the innocence sacrificed under the guise of fighting terrorism cast a dark shadow over the military intervention. The narrative of combating terrorism becomes a convenient cover for pursuing broader geopolitical objectives, leaving in its wake a trail of devastation and a populace grappling with the aftermath of war.

In conclusion, the American military presence in Iraq transcends the initial narrative of weapons of mass destruction. It is a calculated move to secure control over valuable resources, primarily oil, and assert dominance over critical trade routes. The consequences, as witnessed through the eyes of returning soldiers, raise profound questions about the true cost of such geopolitical maneuvers and prompt a critical examination of the motivations that drive nations into war.